Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HQ 15,851 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 91 2-Core 180 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 504 48% 396 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560 1,125 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Apple(106B 0179) ≥ 4GB CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 23.5 Parallax 29.3 20% 25.7 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 23 Splatting 25 20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXS5EA0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,782 Write 1,670 Mixed 829 316% 1,427 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 34.1 100% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 992 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 672 513% 709 MB/s
Poor: 146% Great: 241%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 21.4 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	106x
0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 707 samples	58x
0x483943434E4E4E434C47414C41522D4E5644 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 170 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16