Emachines ER1401

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines ER1401  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ER1401
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime1158.6 Days
Run DateApr 04 '16 at 16:00
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 18
2-Core 36.7
28% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 36.5
8-Core 38
5% 37.2 Pts
64-Core 35.8
2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0448) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1090
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 62
Mixed 69.7
49% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU672203EP02 GU672203EP02 2GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.1
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback