Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '18 at 09:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 507
48% 401 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 99.6
61% 81.1 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 56.7
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 173 173 168 174 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 367
Write 321
Mixed 314
SusWrite 171
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 44.3
144% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 225
171% 232 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
21GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 71 67 69 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 414
Write 84.9
Mixed 136
SusWrite 70.5
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 35.6
131% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 92.3
69% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 160 168 169 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 186
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 165
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback