Intel E5 x79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel E5 x79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 19:53
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 147
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 489
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 56
47% 56.7 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63
Splatting 54.9
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 184 166 147 137 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 466
Write 452
Mixed 382
SusWrite 189
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 36.8
120% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
268% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
83GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 69.9
Write 58.6
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 99
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 100 100 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 95.6
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 99.2
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 Kingston 9965516-048.A 36KSF1G72PZ-1 Kingston 9965516-048.A 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback