TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 17:44
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 134
62% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 378
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 90.7
56% 72.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 76.1
54% 65 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 55.5%
 Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 373 367 370 373 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 399
Mixed 367
SusWrite 363
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47.7
153% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 204
156% 211 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 96.6%
 Great: 134%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
179GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 349 350 355 356 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 431
Write 360
Mixed 312
SusWrite 346
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 36.9
126% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 176
143% 203 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 87.1%
 Great: 103%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
931GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 194 189 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 124
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 181
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
280% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 111%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 168 166 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 117
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 163
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
271% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 94.9%
 Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 50%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples431x
FX-6300AMD  $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples112x
FX-8370AMD  $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples85x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples66x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples51x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples22x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples18x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback