Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L850-A700 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 10:34
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 89.1 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 83 45% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 173 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1001.0 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	2.56% Terrible	Lighting 2.97 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.45 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 3.74 3% 3.44 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.56% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2Z SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 89 94 93 94 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 92.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 88.3 56% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16