Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150511
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 10:03
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175 12,658 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 77.6 37% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 74.2 8-Core 124 12% 98.8 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 72.8 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 64.4 59% 69.5 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 70.2 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 150 81 51 51 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 436 Write 347 Mixed 357 SusWrite 76.2 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 35.2 116% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 208 158% 214 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 91%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 345GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 338 381 359 348 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 370 Write 322 Mixed 342 SusWrite 328 77% 340 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 34 113% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 217 163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 8.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

CPU
Athlon X4 880KAMD $105Bench 46%, 8,721 samples	5x
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	3x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
Array 1 239GBAmd-raidBench 65%, 1,211 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 62%, 6,144 samples	2x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16