Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH317-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienna_KLS
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	18 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '18 at 17:15
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 384 50% 378 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 58.8 57% 67.3 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 66.7 54% 65.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB 4,820 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 409 Write 313 Mixed 280 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 0.5 65% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 51 63% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 7GB free Firmware: AX1P5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 78 79 79 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 85.7 Write 82 Mixed 31 SusWrite 78 50% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$36 590 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 13GB free, PID 1697 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 82 90 91 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 151 Write 86.5 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 88.3 112% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 74% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GB 13,568 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	842x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	235x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	547x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	333x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	196x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	221x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	169x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	108x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	118x
ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,694 samples	90x
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,593 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16