Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '18 at 08:06
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 158
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 509
47% 393 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31
27% 29.9 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 31.7
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 312 311 312 305 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 452
Mixed 436
SusWrite 322
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 47.5
159% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
944GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 151 154 152 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 146
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 152
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 31.3
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $677
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback