Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '18 at 04:26
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 174
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 361
43% 329 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 69.3
56% 69 fps
MRender 74.7
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 57.4
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK11B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 106 107 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 434
Write 351
Mixed 312
SusWrite 133
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 30.5
122% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 199
177% 264 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
149GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 106 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 108
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
264GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 90.3
Write 83.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 77.5
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M2A1600C11 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 029E CMV8GX3M2A1600C11 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback