| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | MSI MS-7693 |
| Motherboard | MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '18 at 00:18 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
62% 99.5 Pts
|
42% 344 Pts
|
27% 431 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
27% 34.6 fps
|
31% 38.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
570GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 136 150 153 152 153 MB/s
|
94.8%
Outstanding
|
112% 153 MB/s
|
309% 2.6 MB/s
| |
|
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
540GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 106 109 110 111 111 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
79% 107 MB/s
|
182% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
746GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 162 161 162 162 162 MB/s
|
95.5%
Outstanding
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
322% 2.63 MB/s
| |
|
|
44.3%
Average
|
44% 59.5 MB/s
|
107% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
60% 66.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,303 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 960x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 412x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 264x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 166x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 149x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $289 |