Fujitsu MS-7379VP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Fujitsu MS-7379VP (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU MS-7379VP
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080718
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '18 at 20:56
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 30.7 2-Core 61.5 37% 54 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 123 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1541 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 24.3 22% 18.1 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 28.3 Splatting 20.5 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 374GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 93 99 98 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 93.4 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 94 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 252GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 93 99 98 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 76.9 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 94 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 21GB free (System drive), PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 2.4 1.7 4.3 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 15 Mixed 16.6 SusWrite 5.4 19% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 82% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7379VP Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu MS-7379VP

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 4,070 samples	2x
GeForce 9500 GSNvidiaBench 2%, 1,408 samples	2x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	2x
Optima 240GBPNY $64Bench 82%, 788 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16