Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 41.7 1-Core 44.5 2-Core 85.3 34% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 171 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6136 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.42% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.19 2% 2.52 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.91 4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.42% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTS400S 256GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 219GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CH1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 291 298 297 296 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 350 Write 292 Mixed 258 SusWrite 291 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 11.5 52% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 184 150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 195 21% 195 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	12x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	12x

SSD
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	7x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	2x
256GB 256GBDogfishBench 69%, 890 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16