Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 16:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 739
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 69.1
67% 77 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 75.6
60% 73.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 99 80 114 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.5% Very good
Read 240
Write 149
Mixed 203
SusWrite 101
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 42.9
164% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 119
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
139GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 493 493 497 500 500 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 462
Mixed 332
SusWrite 495
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 40.7
152% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 185
186% 298 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
325GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 65
Write 72
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 80
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback