Asus Z97-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 374
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 24.2
18% 22.6 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 25.4
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,003
Write 1487
Mixed 607
300% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 51.4
184% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 566
384% 451 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,161
Write 3,607
Mixed 3,422
831% 3,730 MB/s
4K Read 309
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 176
763% 205 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 777
608% 843 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 136 137 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 136
Mixed 75
SusWrite 135
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 126 125 125 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 120
Mixed 75
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 133 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 125
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 134
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 87.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 89.7
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 67%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-00A7B0 640GB
456GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 40 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 38.8
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 22.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO - $215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $872
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback