| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1862 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110811 |
| Uptime | 8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 25 '18 at 22:55 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.5%
Good
|
63% 106 Pts
|
41% 303 Pts
|
19% 306 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
53% 62 fps
|
48% 60 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
51% 231 MB/s
|
65% 27 MB/s
|
17% 30.7 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
511GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15%
Very poor
|
35% 27.6 MB/s
|
66% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.7%
Poor
|
25% 8.67 GB/s
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
51% 79 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 156x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $223 |