Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8393
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170811
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '18 at 18:48
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 174 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 459 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% HP(103C 8393) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 389.12 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 89.4 Parallax 65.8 48% 71.4 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 55.8 Splatting 80.5 57% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,357 Write 1,831 Mixed 2,113 468% 2,100 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 46 172% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 108 119% 202 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 236GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13928 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 689 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 38 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 39641482230	64.7% Good	Read 44.4 Write 394 Mixed 417 66% 285 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 22.6 111% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 96.7 84% 119 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 2x16GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 25.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 21.8 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,243x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	195x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	321x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	300x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	261x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	74x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	66x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	143x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	77x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	66x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16