Lenovo 3218AL6

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3218AL6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170630
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '18 at 12:05
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 382 51% 383 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 2186) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT03L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1481 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 532 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 26 (AE) Unknown 99 99 18 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1863 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 49 219044184097 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 16231955 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3537 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2583 (F9) Unknown 99 99 6656	65.8% Good	Read 265 Write 253 Mixed 261 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 32.5 100% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 94.7 95% 152 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 196GB free Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 145073464 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1950 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 25238848 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 781 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 572391458 (C2) HDA temperature 34 40 60129542178 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 30 145073464 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -117875377434832 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2839537943 (F2) Unknown 100 253 550581268	71.1% Very good	Read 118 Write 129 Mixed 116 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.73 128% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB 2,366 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.7 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3218AL6

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)