Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 21:20
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 85.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 752 72% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,235 76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Vega Frontier Edition-$1,000 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1727 MHz, MLim: 1115 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.6% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 72.8 Parallax 59.5 51% 65.1 fps	MRender 92.3 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 80.3 64% 78.5 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 433GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11563 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 591 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 16 (EB) Unknown 99 99 375 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19470736023	91.8% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 411 Mixed 416 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 25 133% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 70.6 77% 128 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28975 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2314 (B1) Unknown 86 86 162 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 41 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1793 (F1) Unknown 99 99 76531470583	77.2% Very good	Read 507 Write 349 Mixed 349 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 19.5 114% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 38.3 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 18.8 23% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 126%
Samsung MZ7PD480HAGM-000D3 480GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 93GB free Firmware: DXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21854 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1846 (B1) Unknown 98 98 71 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 18304 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1457 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24404226427	72.9% Very good	Read 508 Write 201 Mixed 251 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 27.5 126% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 22.2 28% 47 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 109%
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 30GB free Firmware: MV.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	79.1% Very good	Read 751 Write 342 Mixed 393 109% 495 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 11.9 91% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 13.4 20% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 46.8 MC Write 45.4 MC Mixed 41.2 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 34.1 88% 31 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16