PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | MSI MS-7893 |
Motherboard | MSI 990FXA GAMING (MS-7893) (all builds) |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20151224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '18 at 14:13 |
Run Duration | 260 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.9%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.2%
Good
|
||||
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
44%
Average
|
||||
81.1%
Excellent
|
||||
80.1%
Excellent
|
||||
TOSHIBA STOR.E STEEL S 750GB
433GB free, PID 0b1b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 121x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 43x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $358 |