Medion Erazer X5308 G/C195

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5308 G/C195 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B150H4-EM
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 419 48% 378 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3203) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 28 Parallax 24 22% 26.6 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 24.6 21% 26 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 863 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 242 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 20 (AE) Unknown 99 99 4 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1054 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 54 53 46 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16609442 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1580 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2194 (F9) Unknown 99 99 2560	47.9% Average	Read 498 Write 62.9 Mixed 102 47% 221 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 11.3 68% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 18.4 34% 73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 319GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 167 2358 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 252 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 238 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 558 (C2) HDA temperature 110 107 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.1% Very good	Read 147 Write 128 Mixed 127 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 2.68 4K Mixed 0.27 132% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.9% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 20.4 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5308 G/C195 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Medion Erazer X5308 G/C195

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $378

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16