Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 04:24
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 90.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 264 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 533 8-Core 787 82% 660 Pts	64-Core 797 49% 797 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 38.4 33% 37 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 37 31% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2920 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 739 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12624883937	100% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 408 Mixed 411 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 32.4 144% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 26.3 84% 182 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 376GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 175 5758 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3764 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25225 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2048 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 181 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 19 19 544296 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 31 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.8% Good	Read 125 Write 97.4 Mixed 99.5 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.27 102% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3300620AS 300GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 276GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 91 76152577 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5120 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 847742119 (09) Power-on hours count 44 44 49118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2557 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 34 589299747 (C2) HDA temperature 35 66 55834574883 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 92 56 122567622 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	40.5% Average	Read 69.7 Write 71.3 Mixed 67.2 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB 4,679 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.3% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 109%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	467x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	296x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	111x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	113x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	86x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	41x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	35x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	66x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $841

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16