Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160530
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 266 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 829 84% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 44.6 39% 48.7 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 62 49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 105GB free Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4401562 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -90099823915875 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2844 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 298 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 79 38659883036 (C2) HDA temperature 28 79 38659883036 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4401562 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4401562 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4401562 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18668 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13621 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13621 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12681	76.1% Very good	Read 522 Write 258 Mixed 317 80% 365 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 99.4 4K Mixed 15.7 122% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 16.1 38% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11543 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 706 (B1) Unknown 98 98 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 108 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43462953657	102% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 402 Mixed 410 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 48.5 173% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 43.6 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 25.8 33% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 455GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 345 (03) Spinup time 144 141 3758 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11504 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29315 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1814 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11318 (C2) HDA temperature 111 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 112 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.43 109% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 253GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 133 4108 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10431 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34538 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1808 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10241 (C2) HDA temperature 110 86 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 97.6 Mixed 100 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.26 83% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 147GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 141 3800 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11800 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34771 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1808 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 188 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11611 (C2) HDA temperature 111 74 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.2% Average	Read 93.4 Write 63.9 Mixed 71.6 57% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.35 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB 2,352 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 45.5 MC Mixed 38.1 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 23.6 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	148x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	49x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	9x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	8x
Team-Elite-2400 8x4GBTeamBench 121%, 40 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16