ECS GeForce7050M-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS GeForce7050M-M (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080530
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '18 at 23:20
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 37.3 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 45.6 24% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 48.3 8-Core 47.5 6% 47.9 Pts	64-Core 54 3% 54 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 2125) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.53% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.88 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.91 2% 1.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.53% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65 775 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: PF2OA21B Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 158 158 214 (03) Spinup time 150 150 4305584231 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2221 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 31 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 70093 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1727 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4983 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4983 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 322122874915 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3467	23.3% Poor	Read 43 Write 38.5 Mixed 32 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.04 9% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 31%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2012)-$45 601 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 36GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 152 1325 (04) Start/Stop count 5 5 95478 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7593 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1272 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 330 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 149 149 155448 (C2) HDA temperature 120 96 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 13929 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 95 95 3839	38.1% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 67.7 Mixed 64.3 49% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.25 78% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 371GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 31.8 Mixed 16.5 33% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.42 60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 19%
WDC WD10 EACS-22D6B1 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 157GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 32 Write 33.2 Mixed 9.74 30% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.31 71% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

ECS GeForce7050M-M

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)