Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '18 at 19:36
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 151 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 250 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 57.2 57% 64.7 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 67.7 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 218GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11431 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1782 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 116 (AE) Unknown 100 100 218 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 40 257698955305 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 14217005785 (F7) Unknown 100 100 447469146 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1432252295	50.9% Above average	Read 209 Write 233 Mixed 171 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 17.1 87% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 17.5 24% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 97%
Plextor M5 Pro 256GB-$100 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2433 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2201 (B1) Unknown 100 100 262038 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 155 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 544314 (F2) Unknown 100 100 931416	63.7% Good	Read 374 Write 334 Mixed 282 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 17.8 88% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 19.2 23% 39 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 106%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 151GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 44 (03) Spinup time 147 144 3650 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7072 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26973 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4688 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 255 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 354309 (C2) HDA temperature 105 81 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 54 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 189 69	6.2% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 10.5 Mixed 9.93 8% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.002 4K Write 0.09 4K Mixed 0.001 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 12.2 Mixed 12.5 20% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.74 76% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5403-034.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16