Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '18 at 08:42
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 88.7 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 114 57% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 183 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Lighting 48.2 Reflection 44.5 Parallax 39.9 39% 44.2 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 36.5 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3456 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1008 (B1) Unknown 97 97 43 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 82 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8669881755	51.1% Above average	Read 255 Write 198 Mixed 210 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 16.8 92% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 50.6 DQ Mixed 53.3 36% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 111GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 166 1908 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3494 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6599 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1959 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 538312736 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 159 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3334 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	90.4% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 157 Mixed 145 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.28 108% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44 9,759 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 51GB free Firmware: GM2OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 105 105 12897616066 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9999 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 25981 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7184 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10320 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10320 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 231928758305 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1763	39.7% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 74.4 Mixed 79 55% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.27 72% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB 719 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16