Asus F5GL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus F5GL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK F5GL
Memory	1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100805
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '16 at 22:02
Run Duration	378 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 26.9 2-Core 39.5 35% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 46.4 8-Core 50.2 6% 48.3 Pts	64-Core 53.3 3% 53.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200M G 1,369 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 16B2) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.33% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.41 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.57 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.33% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST925032 0AS 250GB 1,499 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0303 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 31976144 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8388 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 536379914 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15387 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 224 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8317 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 5 5 95 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2581 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 673579048 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1517 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 7938 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3093 (C2) HDA temperature 40 53 51539607592 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 42 26 31976144 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	18.3% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 29.7 Mixed 31.4 24% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 39%
Multi Flash Reader 4GB 305 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 8.91 Write 3.57 Mixed 5.08 7% 5.85 MB/s	4K Read 1.35 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.37 29% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F5GL Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Asus F5GL

CPU
T1600IntelBench 32%, 368 samples	4x
Pentium Dual T3200IntelBench 32%, 2,188 samples	4x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8200M GNvidiaBench 0%, 1,369 samples	13x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	6x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16