| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180507 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '18 at 16:14 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
81% 141 Pts
|
56% 421 Pts
|
26% 428 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
4.13%
Terrible
|
4% 5.06 fps
|
4% 5.19 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Netac 240GB 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
20% 88.3 MB/s
|
2% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
70% 318 MB/s
|
108% 44.2 MB/s
|
95% 173 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45.3%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
63% 63.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,980 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 415x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 241x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 220x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 283x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 220x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 193x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |