Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '18 at 08:45
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 188 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 710 68% 563 Pts	64-Core 1,266 78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 165 Parallax 196 110% 165 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 170 Splatting 119 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 216GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17522 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1739 (B1) Unknown 95 95 180 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 4395 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 4395 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 759 (F1) Unknown 99 99 39208047560
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 216GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2637 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 979 (B1) Unknown 97 97 76 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 50 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 213 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15265966842
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,944 Write 1,220 Mixed 1,183 320% 1,449 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 20.4 118% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 43.3 DQ Write 62.7 DQ Mixed 22.5 26% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 188 975 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2312 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3019 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2292 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 136 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16112 (C2) HDA temperature 117 94 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 34 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 30 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 34	55% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 97.9 Mixed 96.6 72% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.14 54% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 326GB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 144540728 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1711 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 17990789 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3262 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1105 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 25770197011 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 26325418016 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 230 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18732 (C2) HDA temperature 32 46 -140737488355296 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 166 233 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 116148800587621 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13268435118 (F2) Unknown 100 253 11376728307	55.4% Above average	Read 110 Write 82.2 Mixed 104 75% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.28 156% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 33.6 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 24.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,947x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	435x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	284x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	226x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)