Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '18 at 08:09
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 96.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 242 88% 154 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 603 63% 505 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB; gv-n105toc-4gd CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1939 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 41.5 Reflection 34.1 Parallax 39 34% 38.2 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 37.9 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5801 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3481 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 63 (AE) Unknown 100 100 66 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 54 197569347616 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 38219771560 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1200183610 (F8) Unknown 100 100 859391977	78.8% Very good	Read 497 Write 474 Mixed 456 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 15.9 96% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 15.2 20% 34 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 107%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 14GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -40922447487326 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4033 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4014 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4728081 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4014 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 112455 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 47 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 112455 (F2) Unknown 100 100 102381 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4749	67.4% Good	Read 512 Write 180 Mixed 264 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 16.1 92% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 60.8 84% 154 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 835GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 114 111 7283 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4056 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2839 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1107 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12918 (C2) HDA temperature 117 92 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.5% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 95 Mixed 88.3 69% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 159GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 134 131 4266 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14417 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 40 40 44344 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4717 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 184 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14417 (C2) HDA temperature 111 95 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.2% Average	Read 74.7 Write 86 Mixed 53.5 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.3 90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 46%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135 3,861 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free Firmware: STDOA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 118 (03) Spinup time 121 121 30087709022 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9927 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 41405 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4688 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10046 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10046 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 214749347872 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	38.6% Below average	Read 69.8 Write 64.5 Mixed 63.1 50% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.34 95% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 20.5 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 52.2 77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LE PLUS Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS - $412

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	184x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	137x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	107x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	13x
Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 62%, 5,533 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16