Gigabyte GA-PH67-DS3-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-PH67-DS3-B3 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110506
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '18 at 21:35
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 172 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 300 32% 256 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.4 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19109 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 147 (B1) Unknown 98 98 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 104 (F1) Unknown 99 99 50003984979	68.4% Good	Read 367 Write 298 Mixed 265 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 23 110% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 41.4 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 24.5 29% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 26GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 137060997274051 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 198 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 197 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 116 116 143836388 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 197 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 391430 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 51 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 391430 (F2) Unknown 100 100 422036 (F9) Unknown 100 100 13919	54.6% Above average	Read 326 Write 142 Mixed 132 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 16 103% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 14.6 26% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 88%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 145 145 30088954221 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 659 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9283 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1412 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1412 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 184684904485 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95.8% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 172 Mixed 92.2 105% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 3.14 4K Mixed 0.36 129% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 14.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-PH67-DS3-B3 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-PH67-DS3-B3

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	16x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	14x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	24x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	16x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16