Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3.93GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.93GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2.7 GB free of 3.92871 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '18 at 11:43
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+ 272 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42% Average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 52.5 43% 60.4 Pts	4-Core 52.4 8-Core 53.2 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 13.5 1% 13.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 90%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	36% Below average	Read 438 Write 198 Mixed 495 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 6.25 4K Write 9.29 4K Mixed 4.97 21% 6.84 MB/s	DQ Read 0.25 DQ Write 2.04 DQ Mixed 2.06 1% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x3GB 333 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16