Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 21 '18 at 05:06
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 781
69% 588 Pts
64-Core 1091
68% 1091 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.42 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 506
Write 245
Mixed 351
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 14
73% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 51.5
DQ Mixed 42.1
44% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
684GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 95.2
Mixed 84.7
72% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.23
70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
829GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 113
Write 100
Mixed 99.1
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.18
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
348GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 148
Write 134
Mixed 127
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.37
108% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback