Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500T 256 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 118 54% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 211 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2000) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2219 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 1.06 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 19516332292301 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 921 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 921 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 224366 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 224366 (F2) Unknown 100 100 182881 (F9) Unknown 100 100 5427	43.4% Average	Read 410 Write 109 Mixed 137 47% 219 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 9.29 55% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 95.8 DQ Write 96.2 DQ Mixed 32.9 42% 75 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB 7,477 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples	1x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 1,675 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $35

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16