Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '18 at 05:49
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 158 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 496 48% 393 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X 3,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 90.8 55% 72.3 fps	MRender 57.9 Gravity 57.6 Splatting 74.7 53% 63.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9516 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 319 (B1) Unknown 98 98 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 16 16 83876 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24060363301	81.9% Excellent	Read 487 Write 379 Mixed 409 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 23.3 125% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 41.4 DQ Write 73.7 DQ Mixed 71.4 50% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 730GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 170 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2139 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7139 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1210 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 161 161 119465 (C2) HDA temperature 122 111 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 117 Write 107 Mixed 118 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.28 114% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 84%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 259GB free Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 201 199 2916 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1271 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32307 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1069 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 281 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 989 (C2) HDA temperature 124 111 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	116% Outstanding	Read 245 Write 159 Mixed 146 137% 183 MB/s	4K Read 1.47 4K Write 3.89 4K Mixed 0.4 178% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 117%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB 4,731 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 258GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 175 171 4225 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3931 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 44738 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1794 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 386 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3546 (C2) HDA temperature 120 102 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.3% Very good	Read 160 Write 106 Mixed 129 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.35 114% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 77%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 179GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 169 6258 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2964 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 29008 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1062 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 263 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 26860 (C2) HDA temperature 124 111 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	86.5% Excellent	Read 178 Write 124 Mixed 129 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.24 107% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 21 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 15.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16