| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HVGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120918 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '18 at 05:43 |
| Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
| Run User | BGD-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
50.3%
Above average
|
61% 105 Pts
|
26% 195 Pts
|
12% 196 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.69%
Terrible
|
1% 1.6 fps
|
2% 2.65 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
37% 50.8 MB/s
|
45% 0.32 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
36%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
37% 108 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 135 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |