Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 217 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 685 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 917 57% 917 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Lighting 31.2 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 43.7 25% 35.6 fps	MRender 31.9 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 35.3 27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5795 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 358 (B1) Unknown 98 98 84 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 56 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21443560302	91% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 197 Mixed 274 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 45.7 159% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 87.3 97% 167 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 96GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 172 2250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1522 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5782 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 358 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5953 (C2) HDA temperature 101 98 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 143 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.29 119% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 40GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 148 5325 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12696 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 19 19 59634 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4180 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 727 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12675 (C2) HDA temperature 104 96 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 941 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 28 28 52812 (F1) Unknown 200 200 70968045490 (F2) Unknown 200 200 95817517699	52.9% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 92.9 Mixed 87.6 68% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.39 108% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 7GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 134 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7593 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 44568 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3302 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 298 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7294 (C2) HDA temperature 98 89 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 10078 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.1% Below average	Read 70.7 Write 65.2 Mixed 70.2 52% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.3 82% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 33.6 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 30.4 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $1,083

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16