HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 1.6
2-Core 3
1% 2.3 Pts
4-Core 11.1
8-Core 8.4
1% 9.75 Pts
64-Core 13.8
1% 13.8 Pts
Poor: 13% Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.2000
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 54.3
Write 55
Mixed 53.9
41% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.15
4K Mixed 0.09
16% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Adata AD73I1B1674EU 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 2
5% 1.6 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.17 GB/s
Latency 503
8% 503 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback