Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4C-AD5BR
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 21:16
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 153 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 2.78 3% 3.79 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.57 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB 4,336 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 290 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 156 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196622 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 26 (C2) HDA temperature 56 55 193274314796 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 496 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 489 (F2) Unknown 100 100 542 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3 (F5) Unknown 100 100 14 (F6) Unknown 100 100 89984	78% Very good	Read 515 Write 447 Mixed 385 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 12.6 70% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 57.2 87% 165 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 206GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 186 148 1700 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8359 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7612 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3708 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 8783 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 222 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 631503 (C2) HDA temperature 115 96 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 24 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	33.9% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 56.3 Mixed 13.1 32% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.35 83% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 284GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 8.41 25% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.33 37% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AM1U16BC4P2-B19C Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	151x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	500x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16