ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq 6530b (NA407UC#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6530b (NA407UC#ABA) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30DD
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors, 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091208
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration	491 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170 2,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 41.4 2-Core 77.6 41% 62.8 Pts	4-Core 77 8-Core 79.7 10% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 77.8 5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30DD) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.38 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.46 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.52 0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30 3,506 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: PBBOCA0G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 211 100 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 7355 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 18619 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4892 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4063232 (BC) Unknown 100 96 65845 (BE) vendor-specific 57 47 756809771 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 93 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7340144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 9 9 912356 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0
Poor: 6% Great: 34%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB 8,040 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 37GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 21.3 Write 6.25 Mixed 11.7 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 1.1 103% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 6GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 4.19 Mixed 6.13 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.002 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 3.8 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback