Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B250M-Gaming5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration	521 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 105 2-Core 209 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 388 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 41 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 36.4 33% 36.6 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 37.2 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 760GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 167 2550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 554 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1952 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 510 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 702 (C2) HDA temperature 113 95 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86.8% Excellent	Read 174 Write 130 Mixed 98.3 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.12 33% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 109%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3680 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 4734 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5458 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3684 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 85 57 252117007 (C2) HDA temperature 81 55 369557523 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 52570 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	62.5% Good	Read 107 Write 111 Mixed 79 74% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.56 133% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.63% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 3.48 Mixed 5.91 11% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.02 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.005 19% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.63% Great: 7%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Read 26.1 Write 6.05 Mixed 7.46 13% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.88 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.002 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 1x8GB 2,087 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming5-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	27x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	10x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16