Asrock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 15:24
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 97.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 278 96% 172 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 753 80% 639 Pts	64-Core 769 48% 769 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3753) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 19.4 Parallax 22.6 20% 22.4 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 18.7 18% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 342GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 260 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1542930489	125% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 478 Mixed 514 112% 502 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 55.8 193% 69.6 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 138 158% 270 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 136%
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 326GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 260 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 789835187	124% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 480 Mixed 516 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 54.9 193% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 140 152% 256 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 2,495 Write 1,031 Mixed 1,284 351% 1,603 MB/s	4K Read 56.3 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 44 209% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 445 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 150 170% 294 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 236%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 135 12008 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6508 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15866 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 113 (10) Unknown 5 195 89057215792 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6470 (C2) HDA temperature 111 106 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	83.2% Excellent	Read 145 Write 144 Mixed 143 109% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 3.04 4K Mixed 0.26 105% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 28.4 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 32.4 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 49.6 81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	29x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	14x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 81%, 93,353 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16