HP ZBook Studio G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D4
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 196
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 577
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
HP(103C 80D4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 3.16
3% 21.8 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
278GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1,658
Mixed 1,748
408% 1,835 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 31.7
146% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.1
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 32.6
39% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 233%
Great: 354%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW75H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 994
Mixed 1,172
280% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 48.1
169% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 44.1
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 88.1
64% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 182%
Great: 262%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
220GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 303
Write 293
Mixed 300
385% 299 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 15.1
1,765% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 15
1,971% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 219%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G3 Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback