Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B250-FinTech
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 07:01
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 443 58% 438 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 860F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 39.2 39% 39.7 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 38 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 182 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 57 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 264832975	75.9% Very good	Read 492 Write 235 Mixed 292 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 23.9 104% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 59.4 93% 179 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 128%
USB Flash Memory 16GB 2,042 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 9GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 6.22 Mixed 8.29 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.16 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 27% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB 16,539 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.9% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	14x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $239

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16