Asrock H370 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H370 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 01:49
Run Duration	381 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 927 90% 738 Pts	64-Core 1143 71% 1143 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 36.5 31% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 35 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3300 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2408 (B1) Unknown 97 97 50 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 48 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 518 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7853776863	99.5% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 406 Mixed 414 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 38.6 134% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 117 133% 227 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 422GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 239989809 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5756 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 7212806 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6074 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5731 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032836 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 638910502 (C2) HDA temperature 38 48 64424509478 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 25 239989809 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 26628797252116 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3849804672 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3345599010	59.2% Above average	Read 106 Write 100 Mixed 87.1 73% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.38 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 68%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 50GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2890 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4372 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7424 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4144 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 537919520 (C2) HDA temperature 63 51 638582821 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 29505 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 167 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	38.8% Below average	Read 64.6 Write 70.3 Mixed 88.4 57% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.33 95% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 62%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 19GB free Firmware: GF100-07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 73 73 4000 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 8876 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 964555 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 3 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5163 (B8) Unknown 252 252 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 784 (BC) Unknown 252 252 0 (BE) vendor-specific 121 94 44 (C2) HDA temperature 121 94 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 252 252 0	33.3% Below average	Read 69.8 Write 46.2 Mixed 43.2 40% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 42%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 276GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 40.1 Write 41.3 Mixed 31.5 48% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.39 79% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.96% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 3.94 Mixed 6.82 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.94 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.32 94% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.7% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 20.7 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 25.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 56.3 71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Pro4 - $99

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	121x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	82x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	23x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	17x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $538

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16