Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 95.4 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 115 59% 91 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 286 28% 228 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54 40,725 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 32GB free Firmware: Q0518BS Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 721 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3322 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 60 (A3) Unknown 100 100 5 (A4) Unknown 100 100 67121 (A5) Unknown 100 100 159 (A6) Unknown 100 100 74 (A7) Unknown 100 100 132 (94) Unknown 100 100 62341 (95) Unknown 100 100 1873 (96) Unknown 100 100 1761 (97) Unknown 100 100 1833 (9F) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1500 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 23 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 750 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 94430 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 343 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 383796 (F2) Unknown 100 100 410116 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1208178	53% Above average	Read 402 Write 270 Mixed 269 69% 313 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 11 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 34.5 DQ Mixed 10.9 13% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 173 173 21486436614 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2610 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 601 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2535 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2610 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2610 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 193274970148 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 139 Mixed 152 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.22 108% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 181 181 21490434229 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 933 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 220 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 912 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 933 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 933 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 197570002981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	86% Excellent	Read 153 Write 147 Mixed 82.1 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.14 95% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB 9,036 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.5 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 13.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16