Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 17:21
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 86.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 927 84% 708 Pts	64-Core 1,338 83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.4.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 70 Parallax 95.8 55% 77.9 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 57.3 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 141GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1277 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 489 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2023454411	101% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 412 Mixed 425 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 69.2 4K Mixed 44 156% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 74 80% 135 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 69GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5991 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2803 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 163 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2633333901	79% Very good	Read 505 Write 299 Mixed 342 84% 382 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 21.5 116% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 55 66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 108%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -132869108262725 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3201 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 198 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4749 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4863 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4863 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11831	39.5% Below average	Read 196 Write 54 Mixed 74.3 23% 108 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 13.9 88% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 75.8 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 23.3 29% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 51%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,532 Write 1,041 Mixed 1,079 270% 1,217 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 47.1 191% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 151 149% 238 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 46GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4662 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1966 (B1) Unknown 97 97 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 92 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25813236685	99.1% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 418 Mixed 421 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 40.7 150% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 71.9 76% 127 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 189GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 137 4000 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4864 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6762 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3246 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 214 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4649 (C2) HDA temperature 110 93 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.4% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 93.8 Mixed 83 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.34 85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 88GB free Firmware: ZM100-47 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 5952 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17207 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16669 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7684 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 142 40 32 (C2) HDA temperature 142 40 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6816 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	28.9% Poor	Read 49.4 Write 51.1 Mixed 48.7 38% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.35 84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 32.3 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 27.7 84% 29.3 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)