HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	3 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 00:20
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 81 2-Core 160 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 312 42% 316 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 5.83 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 1.91 5% 5.49 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 6.04 5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 391 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 110 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 11 (AA) Unknown 100 100 10 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 262167 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C2) HDA temperature 66 60 171800068130 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 930 (F1) Unknown 100 100 695 (F2) Unknown 100 100 944 (F4) Unknown 100 100 4 (F5) Unknown 100 100 23 (F6) Unknown 100 100 48530	26.3% Poor	Read 231 Write 102 Mixed 166 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 0.27 34% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 57.4 DQ Write 20.7 DQ Mixed 9.63 15% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 100%
WD WD1600AVJS-63SWA0 160GB 1,301 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4GB free Firmware: 58.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 10 (03) Spinup time 149 140 3516 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7990 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15784 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4140 (BE) vendor-specific 70 46 30 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1678 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7991 (C2) HDA temperature 113 89 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	24.1% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 41.3 Mixed 42.2 32% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.28 79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 52%
WD My Passport 0837 1TB 3,852 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 129GB free, PID 0837 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 34.6 Write 32.5 Mixed 30.2 41% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 42GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16