Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '18 at 16:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	MDV-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 640 65% 524 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58% Above average	Lighting 72.4 Reflection 72.8 Parallax 63.3 59% 69.5 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 67.6 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 68 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 87 (A3) Unknown 100 100 10 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1888 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9739 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9605 (F5) Unknown 100 100 7552	89.5% Excellent	Read 462 Write 408 Mixed 422 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 25.6 133% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 27.1 54% 112 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 466GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 160 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 175 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 160 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 171800199200 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.2% Excellent	Read 149 Write 145 Mixed 148 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 3,958 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 44GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 135 Write 54.4 Mixed 74 99% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.26 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.1 108% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.6% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	471x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16