Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '18 at 11:53
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 132 56% 92 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 429 45% 359 Pts	64-Core 553 34% 553 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E115) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 13 Parallax 11.2 13% 13.2 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 18.8 12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17420 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1615 (B1) Unknown 90 90 114 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 45 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 3531223 (EB) Unknown 99 99 418 (F1) Unknown 99 99 48809470852	35.3% Below average	Read 199 Write 137 Mixed 137 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 13.9 59% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 28.2 DQ Mixed 10.2 12% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC96 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 139742576 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10859 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 51 51 1121016011159 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 28017 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2809 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 73015558162 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 37 1237556133924 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1012 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 68 68 64142 (C2) HDA temperature 36 63 25769803812 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 21 11 139742576 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 301 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17828409256033 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3516834025 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1689629194	49.8% Average	Read 83.6 Write 90.1 Mixed 18.6 46% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.17 46% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 114%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 876GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7193 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 430 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3499 (0A) Spinup retry count 108 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 299 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 447 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 180389478439 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3320 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 546 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	71.8% Very good	Read 127 Write 123 Mixed 74.4 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.58 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.23 124% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 104%
WD WD7500AYPS-01ZKB0 750GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 15GB free Firmware: 02.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 206 7 4691 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12173 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 42206 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1296 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 406 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 177 177 69029 (C2) HDA temperature 110 76 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	22.4% Poor	Read 38.2 Write 39.6 Mixed 10.9 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.28 77% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	566x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	144x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16